Zhukorska, Y.
(2024).
Attribution of conduct to an International Organisation: Theory and practice.
Law, Policy and Security,
2(1),
21-32.
https://doi.org/10.62566/lps/1.2024.21
ISSN 2786-8761 e-ISSN 2786-877X UDC 34
Article
Attribution of conduct to an International Organisation: Theory and practice
Received 25.01.2024, Revised 28.04.2024, Accepted 30.06.2024
Abstract
The growing role of international organisations in international relations and their rapid development prompts the creation of a coherent international legal framework that will ensure that these subjects of international law bear full responsibility. Attribution of conduct to an international organisation is a crucial step that precedes attribution of responsibility. The study analysed the Articles on the Responsibility of International Organisations regarding attribution of conduct to an international organisation and the case law on their application with a view to determining whether the application of general rules will be sufficient to attribute conduct to international organisations. An analysis of a series of court decisions on attribution of conduct to international organisations found that judicial institutions are guided by the provisions of the Articles. It was noted that attribution of conduct to international organisations is based on general principles and under agreements between states and an international organisation or between international organisations. It was substantiated that when attributing the conduct of a state body, a body or an agent of an international organisation placed at the disposal of another international organisation, the key criterion should be the exercise of effective operational control and command. It was emphasised that regulation of international responsibility is hardly possible based on general rules, considering the legal nature of international organisations, their specific features and uniqueness. The study proposed to revise the Articles in the light of the practice of their application since 2011, specifically, by judicial institutions, to give them the form of an international legal act and to further expand the practice of using agreements as an additional mechanism for attributing conduct in joint actions or when transferring bodies to another entity. The key provisions of this study will form the basis for further research in this area, the ultimate result of which should be an effective international legal regulation of international responsibility of international organisations in general and attribution of conduct to them, specifically, considering the sui generis nature of international organisations
Keywords:
exercise of effective control; rules of an international organisation; agent of an international organisation; transfer of peacekeeping contingents to the United Nations; shared responsibility; delegated powers
- 849 Views
- Read article
References
[1] Analytical guide to the work of the International Law Commission. Responsibility of international organizations. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/9_11.shtml.
[2] Andreychenko, S.S. (2016). International legal concept of attribution of behavior to the state. (Doctoral thesis, National University “Odesa Law Academy”, Odesa, Ukraine).
[3] Bayani, S. (2022). International legal responsibility of international organizations in the ILC draft articles and beyond. Göttinger: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
[4] Carli, E. (2021). Multiple attribution of conduct in EU security missions. International Organizations Law Review, 18(2), 236-267. doi: 10.1163/15723747-18010002.
[5] Collins, R. (2023). Beyond binary oppositions? The elusive identity of the international organization in contemporary international law. International Organizations Law Review, 20(1), 28-51. doi: 10.1163/15723747-20010003.
[6] Denysova, D.O. (2013). International legal responsibility of international intergovernmental organizations. (Doctoral thesis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[7] Ferstman, C. (2019). Reparations for mass torts involving the United Nations: Misguided exceptionalism in peacekeeping operations. International Organizations Law Review, 16(1), 42-67. doi: 10.1163/15723747-01601003.
[8] Gasbarri, L. (2020). On the benefit of reinventing the wheel: The notion of a single internationally wrongful act. The European Journal of International Law, 31(4), 1223-1234. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chaa083.
[9] Gasbarri, L. (2021). The concept of an international organization in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[10] Johansen, S.Ø. (2019). Dual attribution of conduct to both an international organization and a member state. Oslo Law Review, 6(3), 178-197. doi: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-03-01.
[11] Jorritsma, R. (2021). International responsibility and attribution of conduct: An analysis of Case Law on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. (Doctoral Thesis, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands). doi: 10.26481/dis.20210910rj.
[12] Krieger, H., Peters, A., & Kreuzer, L. (Eds.). (2021). Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[13] Lanovoy, V. (2021). The guiding principles on shared responsibility in international law: Too much or too little? The European Journal of International Law, 31(4), 1235-1247. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chaa085.
[14] Milanovic, M. (2020). Special rules of attribution of conduct in international law. International Law Studies, 96, 296-393.
[15] Mohay, A. (2020). The responsibility of international organisations and their member states: An overview of outstanding questions of interpretation. Pécs Journal of International and European Law, 2, 94-98.
[16] Nedeski, N. (2021). Shared obligations and the responsibility of an international organization and its member states: The case of EU mixed agreements. International Organizations Law Review, 18(2), 139-178. doi: 10.1163/15723747-18010005.
[17] Nollkaemper, A., d’Aspremont, J., Ahlborn. C., Boutin, B., Nedeski, N., Plakokefalos, I., & Jacobs, D. (2020). Guiding principles on shared responsibility in international law. The European Journal of International Law, 31(1), 15-72. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chaa017.
[18] Report of the secretary-general on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. (2008). Retrieved from https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Kos%20S%202008%20354.pdf.
[19] Responsibility of international organizations. (2011). Retrieved from http://legal.un.org/docs/?path=../ilc/reports/2011/english/chp5.pdf&lang=EFSRAC.
[20] Seršić, M. (2022). The responsibility of international organizations, with a special emphasis on the cases of multiple attribution and responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts of international organizations. Bulletin of the Faculty of Law in Zagreb, 72(1-2), 379-400. doi: 10.3935/zpfz.72.12.11.
[21] Tsega, Ch.F. (2021). The responsibility of international organizations for wrongful acts in peacekeeping operations: The case for dual attribution. Indian Journal of International Law, 59(1-4), 301-322.
[22] Voulgaris, N. (2019). Allocating international responsibility between member states and international organizations. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
[23] Won, K.S. (2020). A review on dual attribution of internationally wrongful acts. Dong-A Law Review, 89, 259-286. doi: 10.31839/DALR.2020.11.89.259.